On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 09:02 -0700, Peter Memishian wrote: > > Further flowadm(1M) does follow that convention too. > > > > flowadm -a local_ip=<addr>,remote_ip=<addr> .. > > > > I guess it's better to be explicit and less confusing (which would be > > the case in '-a saddr,daddr' > > Seems a bit uneven to have subcommand names spearated by dashes but the > suboption names separated by underscores :-(
I'm proposing that we use the strings "local" and "remote". We can fix flowadm some other time. On a related note, why don't dladm nor flowadm use getsubopt() for their -p handling (-p <propname>=<propval>,...)? It looks like there's a re-implementation of getsubopt() in libdladm... -Seb
