2009/8/25 Andrew John Hughes <gnu_and...@member.fsf.org>: > 2009/8/25 Christian Thalinger <christian.thalin...@sun.com>: >> Andrew John Hughes wrote: >>> True, but I don't see the advantage in destroying the history just to >>> make the changes into a more convenient set of changesets. >> >> Well, at least when the bsd-port is commited back to jdk7, the history >> is destroyed anyway. I never used Mercurial's rebase, but maybe we can >> keep changes in separate changesets and push them (hopefully) up to >> jdk7, with history? >> >> -- Christian >> > > Depends how you commit it back; in theory you should be able to hg > export the changeset and hg import --exact it to the gate repository, > which will attach it to the same parent changesets. I've done this > between icedtea and JDK7 repositories. > > The only problem I do foresee is jtreg as I doubt the comments for > these changesets have Sun bug IDs... sigh.- > -- > Andrew :-) > > Free Java Software Engineer > Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) > > Support Free Java! > Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK > http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath > http://openjdk.java.net > > PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) > Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8 >
Sorry, not jtreg, jcheck -- too many j* names... :) -- Andrew :-) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
