Perhaps we would have better luck trying to build a Universal binary on 10.4 Intel??
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:42 PM, John Yeary <johnye...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tony, > > That has been my limit too. I am limited on time, and I update the > documents on the builds as I have time, but two nights ago I tried to a > build for PPC with the latest code and "BOOM". So I gave up for the evening > and have not been back. > > I think the first thing we need is a consistent build script that will > build without any general hassle. Setting up a build.sh to run without > issues is key. I have found on PPC that it is really unreliable. On Intel > x86/x64 it is OK. > > John > > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Tony Piselli <tpisell...@mac.com> wrote: > >> I've got a Dual processor G4 with lots of hard drive space that could be >> used for PPC work for 10.5. It's been over a decade since I've done serious >> c/c++ programming let alone dealt with Make files. A while ago I tried to do >> a build but got frustrated and ran out of time to get back into it. >> I may be able to help a couple of hours a week at most. >> >> Tony >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Oct 22, 2010, at 1:27 PM, "Lussier, Denis" <den...@openscg.com> wrote: >> >> I too have had great luck using the old Soylatte build of OpenJDK 6. I >> understand that this can nicely be used as a bootstrap build for OpenJDK7. >> >> What I'm wondering is if anyone is willing (and capable) of getting it so >> that a miore current OpenJDK 6 can be built as a 32-bit Universal OSX binary >> so that Apple can't continue to punish owners of (perfectly good) older Macs >> by denying them access to JDK6. >> >> --Luss >> >> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Sam Pullara < <spull...@gmail.com> >> spull...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I'm hoping that now that Apple has officially decided to no longer >>> maintain the JVM that the community takes over. I've had good luck building >>> it from time to time using soylatte-1.0.3-32 as the base build JVM. >>> >>> Sam >>> >>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Lussier, Denis wrote: >>> >>> I'm curious if anyone (besides myself) might be interested in helping to >>> bring up to current the OpenJDK6 OSX work. >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:35 AM, John Rose < <john.r.r...@oracle.com> >>> john.r.r...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I see that the BSD port has been integrated with b105 since 8/14. >>>> >>>> Meanwhile, JDK7 has now advanced to b115. >>>> >>>> Is there a problem holding up the integration of the new JDK7 changes? >>>> >>>> (Is there a project status page where I should be looking? The wiki >>>> looks too quiet.) >>>> >>>> -- John >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > John Yeary > -- > http://javaevangelist.blogspot.com > http://www.johnyeary.com > > "Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even > though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who > neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight > that knows not victory nor defeat." > -- Theodore Roosevelt >
