Hi Greg, On Mar 13, 2012, at 9:38 PM, Kurt Miller <k...@intricatesoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi Greg, > > On Mar 9, 2012, at 2:17 AM, Greg Lewis <gle...@eyesbeyond.com> wrote: > >> G'day Kurt, >> >> On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:50:08AM -0500, Kurt Miller wrote: >>> On Mar 5, 2012, at 1:55 AM, Greg Lewis <gle...@eyesbeyond.com> wrote: >>>> I've taken some time to get my bsd-port local repo sync'ed up with the >>>> jdk7u2 repo. I'd like to push what I have up into the main repo, but >>>> thought it was worth talking over before I do that since I'm not a >>>> mercurial guru. Here is what I've done so far: >>>> >>>> 1. Pull from the jdk7u2 repo. >>>> 2. Merged and committed (this warned about creating an extra head, but I >>>> went ahead since this seemed reasonable given I was pulling from a new >>>> repo). >>>> 3. Merged Linux specific changes into the BSD specific code, fixed some >>>> merge botches and committed that. >>>> >>>> The result compiles on FreeBSD/i386 and runs a few examples that I tried. >>>> As I said, I'd like to push this up to the main repo now. Some open >>>> questions: >>> >>> Thanks for updating the tree. >> >> No worries. I've had some confirmation for FreeBSD/amd64 too. >> >>>> . Should we tag or branch the current repo first? >>> >>> Yes. Whatever is most similar to a cvs tag seems best so we can record our >>> current state. >> >> Sounds good. Will do that. >> >>>> . Will pushing cause any problem for anyone else? >>> >>> I'm ok with it. >>> >>>> . Has anyone got time to test compile it on other platforms first (or is >>>> the best thing to just push and let people test that way)? >>> >>> I'd rather test after pushing and make any corrections after if needed. >>> >>>> . Should we branch once we've waited for a week or so and use head for >>>> jdk7u4 merging and let any bug fixes go into a jdk7u2 branch? >>> >>> I'm not sure. If we're going to have two active trees, I think branching >>> might be the way to go for this. >> >> Sure. We can figure that out after a little shakedown time too. >> >>>> . Anything I'm missing? >>> >>> Sounds like a good plan to me. >> >> Thanks! I'll likely give it a try this weekend. > > The u4 merging looks perfect so far. I did a test build on OpenBSD x86 and > used the result to build bsd-port again. I won't be able to test amd64 for > several weeks because my lab machines are packed up for a renovation. Thanks > again for the update. I was able to get a test builds for OpenBSD amd64 from the community. I'm okay with the state of the tree. Thanks, -Kurt
