"Victor J. Orlikowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > My only question is, what about authors who want to have the > language engine in the main BSF source, rather than in their > sources (granted, under this scheme, I see no advantage to that > point of view, unless it is to have a "one stop shop" for > engines)? > > (Of course, the real way I see this coming about is demand for a > language engine that the language community is unwilling to > accept/code/maintain - highly unlikely, in any case...)
I'm ok with BSF having some engines if there was cases where that was necessary for whatever reason. If we can more of the engines into the language libs themselves then life would be better! Sanjiva. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
