Hi-
I've got no objection to the change, just a question about the
convertor.
As an example, Integer -> String conversion is covered by the generic
Object -> String conversion,
but what about int -> String? It looks like that would not happen, even
though it's easy enough to do.
Or would that cause trouble in cases where both varieties exist and
have different meaning,
e.g. the StringBuffer constructor? Am I missing something?
Cheers,
Ulf
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
