Hi everyone- > One way to solve this would be to introduce a static field named e.g. > "version" which would carry the exact version information.
This sounds like a good idea. Just don't make the field final, or clients compiled against one version will not be able to distinguish it from another version. Some libraries do that, and the only way around it is to use reflection on the field. Cheers, Ulf --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
