ant elder wrote: > I've just noticed this reply from Geir isn't on the bsf-dev mail archive > even though it was copied to the bsf-dev list, so i'll fwd it here now. Great, thank you!
> Must have been a bit confusing for those trying to understand the > thread :) :) >> >> You can release. You just can't claim that it's a compatible >> implementation. I think that just clearly marking it - say, maybe a >> note in the readme that says "This software hasn't been tested with >> the xxxx TCK, and therefore isn't a compatible implementation of JSR- >> XXX" >> >> should do the trick Well, from a *technical* point of view it should be at least a *compliant* implementation. Wouldn't it be enough to declare that BSF3 was developed according to the JSR-223 specs, but has not yet been tested via the xxx TCK for official compatibility? ---rony --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
