Hi there, > Modified: jakarta/bsf/trunk/bsf3/RELEASE_NOTES > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jakarta/bsf/trunk/bsf3/RELEASE_NOTES?rev=757581&r1=757580&r2=757581&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- jakarta/bsf/trunk/bsf3/RELEASE_NOTES (original) > +++ jakarta/bsf/trunk/bsf3/RELEASE_NOTES Mon Mar 23 22:59:29 2009 > @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ > -Apache BSF 3 Beta3 Release Notes > --------------------------------- > - > -Apache BSF 3 is an implementation of JSR-223, the Scripting for the Java > Platform APIs. > -Note that this software hasn't been tested with the JSR 223 TCK, and > therefore is not a > -compatible implementation of JSR-223. > - > -This 3.0-beta3 release is a maintenance release update to support for the > latest releases > -of various script language engines. > +Apache BSF 3 Beta3 Release Notes > +-------------------------------- > + > +Apache BSF 3 is an implementation of JSR-223, the Scripting for the Java > Platform APIs. > +Note that this software hasn't been tested with the JSR 223 TCK, and > therefore is not a > +compatible implementation of JSR-223. > + > +This 3.0-beta3 release is a maintenance release update to support for the > latest releases > +of various script language engines. > > Propchange: jakarta/bsf/trunk/bsf3/RELEASE_NOTES > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > svn:eol-style = native > Although we have no TCK of JSR-223 (package javax.script) to run BSF3 against, we still are compatible to the specification! As such any JSR-223 scripting language and scripts should be able to run against BSF3. One important point about BSF3 is the possibility it opens to let Java 1.4 and 5 use JSR-223 scripting.
Now, not being a native English speaker I cannot really come up with a text that expresses this (we implement the documented "javax.script" package and as such it is compatible with the specifications, but the concrete implementation of Java 6 of java.scriptx may differ in behaviour slightly, which only could be tested if having the TCK for JSR-223 available to us, which it is not). Maybe you could come up with some sentence that could make that clear, as otherwise I fear that interested potential users are shied away, expecting BSF3 not to be compatible with JSR-223? Regards, ---rony --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org
