On 25/03/2009, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 25/03/2009, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at> wrote: > > Hi Sebb, > > > > just for the record: the final specifications of JSR-223 (probably with > > more information than with the Java 6 docs) can be found here: > > <http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr223/index.html>. > > > Thanks. > > > > > > sebb wrote: > > > I think the javax.script classes are nearly ready. > > > There are one or two unit tests still needed and the Javadoc needs a > > > final going over. > > > > > > The bsf-utils component includes an HTTP component and an XML > > > component. However, HTTP does not seem to be complete, and the > > > ScriptEnginePool is definitely not complete or bug free. > > > > > > The XML component has comments regarding temporary code for beta2, and > > > this is referenced in the ScriptEngineManager.initXMLHelper() method - > > > should this code still be there? > > > > > > If so, the Release Notes should note that these classes are not > complete. > > > > > > > +1 > > > OK, I'm currently adding details on the (few) API changes I have made. > > > > > > > > > == > > > > > > There's almost no documentation on BSF 3.0 - the existing > > > documentation is all about BSF 2, which is completely different. > > > There's also no information on upgrading. > > > > > > I think these need fixing before a formal (non-beta) release of 3.0 can > be made. > > > > > > > Maybe. :) > > > > Seriously, I think too that a section on BSF-3 needs to be added that > > points out that > > > > * BSF-3.0 is not compatible with BSF-2.4, but an opensource > > implemenation of JSR-223 a.k.a. "Java 6 scripting", > > * BSF-3.0 can be deployed and used starting with Java 1.4.2 (no > > dependency on Java 6), > > * that there are plans to bridge both frameworks by eventually > > supplying a BSF 2.4 engine that bridges all BSF 3 scripting > > languages [based on ant's engine], and a BSF 3.0 engine that > > bridges all BSF 2.4 scripting languages (this would allow a smooth > > migration path to BSF 3.0), > > * BSF-2.4 remains maintained for those who have been using it. > > > > Regards, > > > > > > ---rony > > > > > > P.S.: Asked Geir for the TCK-223. If that does not work out, I try to > > get it for private use from Mike Grogan as a member of JSR-223. > > > It might be interesting to run the JUnit tests against the Java 6 > implementation. > That would help show if the tests agree with the spec., but of course > won't reveal any missing tests. > > Not sure how easy it will be to ignore the local classes - I might > have to create a temporary Eclipse project and copy the code over.
Just done that - and the tests seem to work OK with Sun Java 1.6.0_11, once I added the resources section to the classpath so it could pick up the Test Factory. Probably means I've not written enough tests ;-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org
