On 28/07/2009, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27/07/2009, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at> wrote: > > Hi Sebb, > > > > > > sebb wrote: > > > Is there any interest in releasing a non-Beta 3.0 version of BSF? > > > > > > I'd like to update JMeter to use BSF 3, and would prefer to ship it > > > with a non-Beta release if possible. > > > > > > There don't seem to be any outstanding JIRA bugs for 3.0. > > > > > > I found a minor problem with the Main class (throws NPE rather than > > > reporting that it cannot find a language implementation) which I will > > > fix shortly. > > > I found I had already fixed it; but it missed the last release. > > There is another problem, which is that the -lang option says it takes > the language as a value; however it actually requires the extension. > > I'd like to correct this, and add an option to use the short language > name (e.g. jython). > > Ideally I'd like to > rename -lang to -ext and > add -lang to mean shortLanguage
I've committed this change, and also added a -show option. > This would only affect the utility main class, but would potentially > break some scripts. > > As there has yet to be a formal release, perhaps this does not matter? > > > > > > I also think it would be useful to add the Main class to the manifest > > > so one can execute the jar directly. Tried this, but it does not help as additional jars are needed (-jar overrides classpath). > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > Well, I guess it would be o.k. to go for a release as it psychologically > > might make a differences. In fact I found (and fixed) a bug in one of the javax classes, so it would be useful to do another release at some point. > > --- > > > > Have been waiting on getting somehow access to the JSR-223 TCK. My last > > attempt a couple of months (sending an e-Mail to the spec lead Mike > > Grogan) resulted in an e-mail-address error from the Sun mailer to the > > effect that that e-mail address was unknown. Just tried it again and > > received: > > > > This report relates to a message you sent with the following header > fields: > > > > Message-id: <4a6e17aa.2080...@wu-wien.ac.at> > > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:10:02 +0200 > > From: "Rony G. Flatscher" <rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at> > > To: mike.gro...@sun.com > > Subject: Ping ... > > > > Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients: > > > > Recipient address: @sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:mike.gro...@sun.com > > Original address: mike.gro...@sun.com > > Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address > > Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.1.1 > <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:mike.gro...@sun.com>... User unknown > > Remote system: dns;sunmail5.uk.sun.com > (TCP|129.146.11.74|57021|129.156.85.165|25) > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Original-envelope-id: 0kng00d08llmi...@nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.sun.com > > Reporting-MTA: dns;nwk-avmta-1.sfbay.Sun.COM (tcp-daemon) > > > > Original-recipient: rfc822;mike.gro...@sun.com > > Final-recipient: rfc822;@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:mike.gro...@sun.com > > Action: failed > > Status: 5.1.1 (Remote SMTP server has rejected address) > > Remote-MTA: dns;sunmail5.uk.sun.com > (TCP|129.146.11.74|57021|129.156.85.165|25) > > Diagnostic-code: smtp;550 5.1.1 > > <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:mike.gro...@sun.com>... User unknown > > > > > > Not sure, whether this is a relaying error or not. > > > > Anyway, in March I posted on the ASF jcp list another request to Geir > > w.r.t. JSR-223 therefore (and cc'ed it to this list), but that has not > > brought up news so far either. > > > That's a pity. > > But if we do eventually get the TCK, we could release 3.0.1 or 3.1 > after testing. > > > > --- > > > > So again, whatever you think serves the purpose best, it has my +1. > > > > HTH, > > > > > > ---rony > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org
