On Oct 17, 2012, at 7:18 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]> wrote:
> (Way too busy this week to reply to everything yet, but keep the > questions and bug reports and patches coming!) Not patches. I'm just committing willy-nilly to master. I like to live on the edge. > +1 for changing the names. Note that this has already partly happened: we > encourage people to do 'bucardo add table..' now instead of 'bucardo add > goat..'. > Not 100% sure I like relation. It's a pretty obscure term for non-db-theory > folk, and Postgres doesn't push it very heavy on casual users. I also don't > want to paint ourselves into a corner in case we end up replicating something > someday that is not what Postgres considers a relation. But perhaps it's > not important anyway, if we keep it semi-hidden and just let people use > 'table', 'sequence', 'view', etc. Well, perhaps I'll see about eliminating the word "goat" from the options and docs altogether. Might be possible. if not, I'll use "relation" >> Change "herd" to "relgroup" > > This is the part that really undoes the above, however. I think relgroup > does make the most sense, or at least XXgroup. Or even just 'group'. > Feel free to make the change, if you want, I don't think I will come > up with better terms and if I do, I have a commit bit as well. :) Sounds like a plan, thanks. David
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Bucardo-general mailing list [email protected] https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general
