Thanks for the reply Mitchell. So you do something along the lines of: in master1: bucardo add dbgroup master1:source master2:target and fire off the relative sync and on master2: bucardo add dbgroup master2:source master1:target and fire off the relative sync?
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Mitchell Perilstein < [email protected]> wrote: > We're running differently from Rosser's one-bucardo suggestion--which > does make sense. We're dual master but we need both boxes to be as > identical as possible partly because the process has to be repeatable on > many pairs and also because we bounce our apps on occasion but want the DBs > to stay in sync. So we have bucardo on each box, with each local bucardo > writing to its remote peer. So it's a criss-cross arrangement. > > For our purpose, at least, this also gets us a little bit of HA: even if > our application layer and bucardo are down on one box, as long as its > database is running, the fully-up peer box will continue writing its > changes to the partly down box. > > I'm not saying our approach is correct, but it's working for us. > > > > On 06/14/2013 07:17 AM, Rosser Schwarz wrote: > > Bucardo only needs to be installed on one host, although obviously, that > won't provide HA capability. Typically, in a master-master scenario, it's > installed on one of the masters. In the event either of the masters then > goes down, the Bucardo daemon wouldn't have anything to do anyway, so HA > for it is pretty moot. > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Athanasios Kostopoulos > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In continuation to my previous email? > For example the following approach might be effective: > - install bucardo on master1 > - setup replication as follows: master1: master - master2: slave > - verify that replication works > If the above are correct then: > - install bucardo on master2 > - setup replication as follows: master2: master - master1: slave > - verify replication works > Will the previous be enough or I am missing a fundamental piece here > (perhaps not needing to run bucardo on two different hosts and use one > setup (say on master one) and two replication streams. How will this handle > failover? > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Athanasios Kostopoulos > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear all, > first of all, thanks for the hard work that has been put into bucardo. I > am a novice and I have the following perhaps trivial question: > when wanting to create a master-master setup, do I need to install > bucardo (e.g. bucardo install) on both of the masters? I am on Debian 7 > wheezy with bucardo 4.99.7, installed from the Debian repositories. Thanks > in advance for any answers to my perhaps trivial question. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bucardo-general mailing > [email protected]https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bucardo-general mailing > [email protected]https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general > > > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including any attachments) is > intended only for the recipients named above. It may contain confidential > or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used > by any other person. If you are not a named recipient, please notify the > sender of that fact and delete the e-mail from your system. >
_______________________________________________ Bucardo-general mailing list [email protected] https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general
