Hello, I'm new to Bucardo and I'm trying to evaluate it. When running the test suite on a fresh git clone I get errors on 10-fullcopy.t:
$ make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00-release.t ............... skipped: Test skipped unless environment variable RELEASE_TESTING is set t/01-basic.t ................. ok t/02-bctl-customname.t ....... ok t/02-bctl-db.t ............... ok t/02-bctl-dbg.t .............. ok t/02-bctl-herd.t ............. ok t/02-bctl-sync.t ............. ok t/02-bctl-table.t ............ ok t/10-fullcopy.t .............. 45/81 # Failed test '(fullcopy) B.Bucardo_test3 copy ok (BIGINT) [line: 103]' # at t/10-fullcopy.t line 103. # Structures begin differing at: # $got->[1] = ARRAY(0x32184c8) # $expected->[1] = Does not exist # Failed test '(fullcopy) B.bucardo space test copy ok (INT) [line: 103]' # at t/10-fullcopy.t line 103. # Structures begin differing at: # $got->[1] = ARRAY(0x3218120) # $expected->[1] = Does not exist # Failed test '(fullcopy) B.bucardo_test1 copy ok (SMALLINT) [line: 103]' # at t/10-fullcopy.t line 103. # Structures begin differing at: # $got->[1] = ARRAY(0x3218468) # $expected->[1] = Does not exist [lots of similar failures snipped] The Bucardo-4.99.7 test suite works fine in the same context. Should I stick to Bucardo-4.99.7 for evaluation purposes or is HEAD actually safe? Thanks Antoine. _______________________________________________ Bucardo-general mailing list [email protected] https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general
