On 9/25/13 3:08 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hello,
I'm new to Bucardo and I'm trying to evaluate it. When running the test
suite on a fresh git clone I get errors on 10-fullcopy.t:
$ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0,
'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/00-release.t ............... skipped: Test skipped unless environment
variable RELEASE_TESTING is set
t/01-basic.t ................. ok
t/02-bctl-customname.t ....... ok
t/02-bctl-db.t ............... ok
t/02-bctl-dbg.t .............. ok
t/02-bctl-herd.t ............. ok
t/02-bctl-sync.t ............. ok
t/02-bctl-table.t ............ ok
t/10-fullcopy.t .............. 45/81
# Failed test '(fullcopy) B.Bucardo_test3 copy ok (BIGINT) [line: 103]'
# at t/10-fullcopy.t line 103.
# Structures begin differing at:
# $got->[1] = ARRAY(0x32184c8)
# $expected->[1] = Does not exist
# Failed test '(fullcopy) B.bucardo space test copy ok (INT) [line: 103]'
# at t/10-fullcopy.t line 103.
# Structures begin differing at:
# $got->[1] = ARRAY(0x3218120)
# $expected->[1] = Does not exist
# Failed test '(fullcopy) B.bucardo_test1 copy ok (SMALLINT) [line: 103]'
# at t/10-fullcopy.t line 103.
# Structures begin differing at:
# $got->[1] = ARRAY(0x3218468)
# $expected->[1] = Does not exist
[lots of similar failures snipped]
The Bucardo-4.99.7 test suite works fine in the same context. Should I
stick to Bucardo-4.99.7 for evaluation purposes or is HEAD actually
safe?
Thanks
Antoine.
I experience exactly the same failures when I run the test suite on the
latest git revisions. I've never been able to get the tests to run all
the way through to the end without error. What are the particulars of
your installation? Perhaps we can find a common problem. I'm on Debian
Squeeze, 64bit, perl 5.10, postgresql 8.4.
--
Paul Theodoropoulos
www.anastrophe.com
_______________________________________________
Bucardo-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general
