Why did you remove the onetimecopy option in Bucardo 5? How should we handle changes during copy?[It's a master slave replication]
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Maryam Rabiee <[email protected]> wrote: > As I mentioned it's 5.3.1. If onetimecopy is not working yet for Bucardo5 > , why is it in the help for add sync command ? why isn't there any record > of type in options for syncs? Fullcopy syncs aren'r available in Bucardo5? > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 07:19:07PM +0430, Maryam Rabiee wrote: >> > I'm currently using bucardo 5.3.1 , I added a sync with option >> > onetimecopy=1 but the problem is the tables aren't replicated in the >> slave. >> > There are no errors in the log file and also no copies or deletes, but >> > when I check the status of the sync the Current State field is "DELETE >> > public.tableX" . This table is empty in the slave and the state doesn't >> > change. >> > What should I do to find the problem or make Bucardo start syncing? >> >> What version of Bucardo is this? >> >> onetimecopy is not working yet for Bucardo5, you will need to do a >> manual copy of the data, or "touch" all the rows on the source. >> >> -- >> Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected] >> End Point Corporation >> PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 >> > >
_______________________________________________ Bucardo-general mailing list [email protected] https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general
