On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 03:08:01PM +0000, Johan Peeters wrote: > We have a 3 DB's setup in master-master environment. ... > I think the scenario when a server fails should be like this: > - the synchronization between the other running servers continues > -- the failed server should be deactivated in the sync (and have to be > activated manually later) OR > -- Bucardo tries to make connection to the failed one (and when its online > sync the missing records) > > Is there a workaround ?
No direct workaround, no. It is a known problem, with no easy solution, as keeping track of which rows have been replicated to which fraction of an existing sync is a tricky (but solveable) problem. A future version will have a sync-level option that tells Bucardo to drive on, continuing to replicate to what it can, and then autmatically cathching the flaky servers back up once they come alive. -- Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected] End Point Corporation PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Bucardo-general mailing list [email protected] https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general
