Stie cineva ce este cu gunoiul asta care vine inapoi de fiecare data
cand postez la grupul Bucuresti?
Dan G
SYMPA wrote:
Selleks, et saata kaasa pandud kiri listi semio.kuwi.dialogue:
mailto:[email protected]?subject=confirm%206089cc5ebf2609babb4ace2420862cfb
või saatke kiri aadressile [email protected] järgneva teemareaga:
CONFIRM 6089cc5ebf2609babb4ace2420862cfb
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: [Bucuresti] Pasajul Pipera - greseala secolului in constructii
From:
Dan Ghiocel <[email protected]>
Date:
Sun, 24 May 2009 13:39:04 -0700
To:
[email protected]
To:
[email protected]
Received:
from sun8.it.da.ut.ee (sun8.it.da.ut.ee [193.40.5.191]) by erme.ut.ee
(8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n4PBtTPj002566 for
<[email protected]>; Mon, 25 May 2009 14:55:29 +0300
Received:
from n75c.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (n75c.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com
[98.136.45.74]) by sun8.it.da.ut.ee (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with SMTP id
n4PBsSDo001527 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 25 May 2009
14:54:29 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature:
v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima;
t=1243252462; bh=44UCehSLgVzp1S/3WzKPrk6gwcTcC5zyXOM5zRiwBos=;
h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:Received:Received:Received:DKIM-Signature:Received:Received:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:To:References:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:X-eGroups-Approved-By:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type;
b=NWA28chGxp2+KFkwdEStZNR/jehnMAe4RPdS4lhCAV2EtMgpwuWyOMkHoSdUmDZo3skvup1SvJV2SOdZ1JMp0uSoimWcvZSQrkiS0GS01XoR7LQUo7gsmq90S3neBhV0
DomainKey-Signature:
a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com;
b=GQscX5N+NpmBbxN9iHAPSv204kx4VoxoG7hnUy/kZyI2Kev3h8iZZoULDilUubXkqYsT73+jY3mlg4CW9t1odXPRJwe7TvvgNA9D0sn6CGwkBoVidq/tQbGTk/GKBDxd;
Received:
from [69.147.65.172] by n75.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25
May 2009 11:54:22 -0000
Received:
from [69.147.108.194] by t14.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25
May 2009 11:54:22 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:
17950252-m7952
Received:
(qmail 58799 invoked from network); 25 May 2009 11:54:14 -0000
Received:
from unknown (69.147.108.200) by m3.grp.re1.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25
May 2009 11:54:14 -0000
Received:
from unknown (HELO n38b.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (66.163.168.152) by
mta1.grp.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 May 2009 11:54:14 -0000
DKIM-Signature:
v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima;
t=1243252439; bh=CH8iJCR7EGPPQH5ouuOfBBZYdRPeHdnkmerubxxCyEk=;
h=Received:Received:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:Reply-To:Subject:X-Yahoo-Group-Post:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-eGroups-Approved-By:X-eGroups-Auth;
b=skKv2vTmqxQrwFIu2eBmiXvYKzkb/jvUuyNkQuaYLuNLaB1X1kmA0HaeEjh95gXTvIvKKKyjjMXJ3HUYYdH0+8CdVbHufiR0Nrhl/N33Gm9YREN/RwZtF7qgQxTibH6f
Received:
from [69.147.65.171] by n38.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25
May 2009 11:53:59 -0000
Received:
from [98.137.35.12] by t13.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25
May 2009 11:53:59 -0000
X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Apparently-To:
[email protected]
X-Received:
(qmail 33759 invoked from network); 24 May 2009 20:40:19 -0000
X-Received:
from unknown (69.147.108.201) by m8.grp.re1.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24
May 2009 20:40:19 -0000
X-Received:
from unknown (HELO mail408.opentransfer.com) (98.130.1.139) by
mta2.grp.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 May 2009 20:40:18 -0000
X-Received:
(qmail 26471 invoked by uid 399); 24 May 2009 20:24:24 -0000
X-Received:
from unknown (HELO ?98.210.214.74?) (98.210.214.74) by
mail408.opentransfer.com with ESMTP; 24 May 2009 20:24:24 -0000
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2)
Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-Accept-Language:
en-us, en
References:
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
In-Reply-To:
<[email protected]>
X-Originating-IP:
98.130.1.139
X-eGroups-Msg-Info:
1:12:0:0:0
X-Yahoo-Profile:
ddghiocel
X-eGroups-Approved-By:
nitsalexandru <[email protected]> via web; 25 May 2009 11:53:57
-0000
Sender:
[email protected]
MIME-Version:
1.0
Mailing-List:
list [email protected]; contact [email protected]
Delivered-To:
mailing list [email protected]
List-Id:
<Bucuresti.yahoogroups.com>
Precedence:
bulk
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:[email protected]>
Reply-To:
[email protected]
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:
groups-email-ff-m
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030900010506070402090505"
X-ut-ee-MailScanner-Information:
Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ut-ee-MailScanner-ID:
n4PBsSDo001527
X-ut-ee-MailScanner:
Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From:
sentto-17950252-7952-1243252458-semio.kuwi.dialogue=lists.ut...@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Sa inteleg ca proiectul pasajului este "treaba romaneasca"?
Dan G
Alexandru Cristian (Sandu) Surcel wrote:
Din cate stiu eu piata de constructii din Romania in momentul de
fata, cel mai probabil straini cu subcontractori romani. Strainii
pentru numele cu lustru, romanii cu munca.
În data de 22 mai 2009, 23:03, Dan Ghiocel <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> a scris:
Din prezentare problemei am avut impresia ca este vorba doar de
linii de inalta tensiune, obisnuite,, nu de calea ferata
electrificata.
Bineinteles, problema si solutia sunt diferiteCine a fost
proiectantul pasajului? Romani, straini?
Dan G
petcu andrei wrote:
Esti beep sau te faci? Este vorba de liniile de inalta tensiune
de la calea ferata. Dupa ce le ridica asa cum propui tu ce mai
trebuie sa mai faca? Sa construiasca si locomotive mai inalte?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Dan Ghiocel <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 1:32:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Bucuresti] Pasajul Pipera - greseala secolului in
constructii
Si care-i problema? Nu se pot ridica liniile de iinalta tensiune?
Dan G
Mirabela Gradinaru wrote:
http://www.tykryt. com/2009/ 05/20/pasajul- pipera-greseala-
secolului- in-constructii/
<http://www.tykryt.com/2009/05/20/pasajul-pipera-greseala-secolului-in-constructii/>
http://www.realitat ea.net/foto_ 783162_pasajul-
pipera--aproape- de-firele- de-inalta- tensiune_ 521557.html#
multimediaPlayer
<http://www.realitatea.net/foto_783162_pasajul-pipera--aproape-de-firele-de-inalta-tensiune_521557.html#multimediaPlayer>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.36/2126 - Release Date: 05/21/09 06:22:00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG -
www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.36/2128 - Release Date: 05/22/09
06:03:00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.37/2131 - Release Date: 05/24/09 07:09:00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.39/2134 - Release Date: 05/25/09 18:14:00
