On 21 March 2014 19:55, Jay Foad <[email protected]> wrote:
> >\3 1 2 > 3 1 1 > > I think your explanation of scan would lead to the result 3 1 0. > > Associativity matters because the last item of the result is 3>1>2, > which means 3>(1>2). But your explanation would lead to (3>1)>2 as the > last item. > You are right, but that can be addressed by defining my solution to simply evaluate the pairs from the right. Regards, Elias
