On 2014-03-31 15:37:45, Elias MÃ¥rtenson wrote: > Are you sure it's a bug? You seem to be taking the value of "r" when it has no > value.
I think the problem is that you can't edit a function that is currently on SI stack, not that Parse erred. -k
On 2014-03-31 15:37:45, Elias MÃ¥rtenson wrote: > Are you sure it's a bug? You seem to be taking the value of "r" when it has no > value.
I think the problem is that you can't edit a function that is currently on SI stack, not that Parse erred. -k