Hi Jürgen: Never noticed the link before but I just printed it out for thoughtful reading.
respect…. Peter On 2014-05-08, at 10:25 AM, Juergen Sauermann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have written a proposal earlier but haven't received any comments so far. > > The document is available here: > http://www.gnu.org/software/apl/Library-Guidelines.html > so that we don't need to scan the bug-apl mail archive. > > According to it package⍙ is the prefix for meta information of a package > while package∆ is > the prefix for package functions and global variables. > > I also believe that we should have a common web page for libraries and all > the other GNU APL related > contributions from the GNU APL community so that they dont get lost and > people dont need to scan > the bug-apl mail archive for the latest version. > > /// Jürgen > > > On 05/08/2014 03:01 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote: >> Is this the standard system we should abide by? To separate the module and >> function name with ⍙? Are we using ∆ for public functions and ⍙ for private >> ones? So far I've used ∆∆ (two deltas) as separator for internal functions. >> >> Regards, >> Elias >> >> >> On 8 May 2014 20:56, Juergen Sauermann <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> thanks, fixed in SVN 252. >> >> /// Jürgen >> >> >> >> On 05/07/2014 08:53 PM, David B. Lamkins wrote: >> 'lib_file_io' ⎕fx 'pkg⍙fileio' >> pkg⍙fileio >> )erase pkg⍙fileio >> 'lib_file_io' ⎕fx 'pkg⍙fileio' >> pkg⍙fileio >> pkg⍙fileio⍬ >> VALUE ERROR >> pkg⍙fileio⍬ >> ^ >> >> >> >> >> >> >
