Hi,
actually - no. I called it OUTER_OMEGA to make clear what it does.
Maybe you like
* { ⍵ + {⍵×WW} 10 ⊣ WW←⍵ } 100
1100
*
imore?
On 07/09/2014 04:08 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
I know, but it's much more ugly than my proposal, don't you think?
Regards,
Elias
On 9 July 2014 22:06, Juergen Sauermann <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Elias,
that would be very easy to implement:
* { ⍵ + { ⍵ × OUTER_OMEGA } 10 ⊣ OUTER_OMEGA←⍵ } 100
1100
*
/// Jürgen
On 07/09/2014 10:53 AM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
It would be nice to be able to access the values of ⍵ and ⍺ (and
I suppose χ) from the outer lambda from a nested lambda.
I.e, I'd like to following to return the value 1100:
*{ ⍵ + {⍵×⍵⍵} 10 } 100*
In other words, the ⍵⍵ in the inner lambda would refer to the
value 100 (i.e. the value of ⍵ in the outer lambda).
Would this be easy to implement?
Regards,
Elias
