On 16 August 2015 at 19:03, Blake McBride <[email protected]> wrote:
> I understand what you are saying. However, rather then bend outcome to > fit technical difficulty or complexity, I prefer to take whatever technical > effort it takes to produce the desired outcome. > Of course. It is, however, my current conviction that the technical effort needed is on par with defining an extension of Unicode (including a new normalisation form), and even if you do that you'll end up with a solution that is very much a mess, not compatible with the rest of modern computing (i.e. Unicode) and all for a benefit that is not even necessarily a benefit. That said, I'm willing to listen to any technical proposal you may have as to how to solve the real technical incompatibility between Unicode and your requirement. It's just that I can't think of any. Regards, Elias
