Juergen Sauermann <juergen.sauermann@...> writes: > > Hi Louis, > > it would help if you could provide the file for which the *)LOAD* fails. > > /// Jürgen >
My WS is called EULER (all caps), but in my "APL/workspace/" I have: EULER EULER.bak EULER.xml I also have a WS called EULER1 (but it only consists of one file called "EULER1”).
EULER.xml
Description: XML document
EULER
Description: Binary data
EULER.bak
Description: Binary data
> On 31 Aug 2015, at 15:03, Juergen Sauermann <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Louis, > > it would help if you could provide the file for which the *)LOAD* fails. > > /// Jürgen > > > On 08/31/2015 02:38 AM, Louis de Forcrand wrote: >> I forgot to include this in my previous message. Sorry. >> >> I'm on a Mac, and I save my workspaces in >> ~/Documents/APL/workspaces/ >> (apparently GNU APL automatically puts WSs in the workspace dir) >> "~/" is "/Users/myaccount/" on Macs. >> >> When I cd into "APL/" then start GNU APL and do ")LOAD wsid", >> I get this error message: >> >> >> )load EULER >> >> =================================================== >> Assertion failed: level >= 0 >> in Function: read_Function_name >> in file: Archive.cc:2257 >> >> Call stack: >> >> ---------------------------------------- >> -- Stack trace at Archive.cc:2257 >> ---------------------------------------- >> 0x0 @@@@ >> 0xa @@@@ >> 0xa @@@@ >> 0xa @@@@ >> 0xa @@@@ >> 0xa @@@@ >> 0xa @@@@ >> 0xa @@@@ >> 0xa @@@@ >> 0xa @@@@ >> 0xa @@@@ >> 0xa @@@@ >> 0xa @@@@ >> 0xa @@@@ >> ======================================== >> >> SI stack: >> >> Depth: 4 >> Exec: 0x7fc1b0c13d40 >> Safe ex: no >> Pmode: ◊ ~2 FIB 5 >> PC: 0 >> =================================================== >> Assertion failed: idx < items_valid >> in Function: operator[] >> in file: ./Simple_string.hh:140 >> >> Call stack: >> *** do_Assert() called recursively *** >> =================================================== >> *** immediate_execution() caught other exception *** >> >> Right now I can do ")COPY wsid", and it works fine, but I have to >> rename it and overwrite the previous one each time. >> Any insight? >> >> Again, best regards, >> Louis >
