#2 looks good. I don't see any change on item #3. Thanks!
Blake On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Juergen Sauermann < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Blake, > > thanks, fixed in *SVN 678*. > > /// Jürgen > > > On 09/12/2015 05:01 PM, Blake McBride wrote: > >> 1. )SAVE (as always) is perfect >> >> 2. )DUMP adds the word "DUMPED". For example, the following is produced: >> >> )WSID ws >> WAS CLEAR WS >> )SAVE >> 2015-09-12 09:19:47 (GMT-5) ws >> )DUMP >> DUMPED 2015-09-12 09:19:51 (GMT-5) >> >> I would prefer to see the word "DUMPED" removed for three reasons. >> >> a. )SAVE doesn't say "SAVED" so it is inconsistent >> b. Just like I know I typed ")SAVE", I also know I typed ")DUMP". I >> don't need it echoed. >> c. It is cleaner >> >> 3. Make loading of a dump file the same as loading a ws. For example: >> >> )LOAD ws >> SAVED 2015-09-12 09:14:49 (GMT-5) >> )LOAD dump >> loading )DUMP file /home/blake/workspaces/dump.apl... >> WAS CLEAR WS >> >> I would strongly prefer )LOAD'ing of a dumped file to provide the same >> message as loading of a ws except perhaps that the word "SAVED" is replaced >> with "DUMPED". All this is just cleaner and more APL-like. >> >> >> 4. )QLOAD of ws and dump work perfectly. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Blake >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Juergen Sauermann < >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Blake, >> >> thanks, fixed in *SVN 676*. I introduced a new command *)DUMPV* >> (DUMP verbose) which is >> like the old *)DUMP* and made the new *)DUMP *less verbose. >> Sometimes, when )DUMP fails >> (e.g. because a directory is missing) it is convenient to know the >> complete file name information. >> >> /// Jürgen >> >> >> On 09/10/2015 03:55 AM, Blake McBride wrote: >> >>> Same as for item 2 with the ")LOAD" command. -- it should look >>> _exactly_ as if a .xml file was loaded. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Blake McBride >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> .APL files seem to be better support, and due to version >>> compatibility problems, are to be strongly favored IMO. So, >>> if we are to make greater use of .APL files, I'd like to see >>> two things: >>> >>> 1. )QLOAD on .APL files should be silent just like it is >>> with .xml files. >>> >>> 2. Can a config flag be added to make the output of a )DUMP >>> look more APL'ish? I know I typed ")DUMP" just like I know >>> when I typed ")SAVE". Why should ")DUMP" give all that >>> information that ")SAVE" does not? I'd like the config flag >>> to make the output of ")DUMP" appear _exactly_ as it does for >>> ")SAVE". >>> >>> (As a side note, I understand the difference between the two, >>> and I like what the .XML file gives us. I also think the way >>> you associate SAVE with the .xml format, and APL with the >>> DUMP format is good.) >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Blake >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
