Hi Elias,
this is quite feasible technically. What I don't like, though is the
incompatibility
that it creates for the source code.
Suppose I write a function Z←AؠB. Who else except myself can decipher
what it is supposed to mean? I strongly believe that restriction names
to almost only ASCII letters (and writing the names in English) is a very
good convention that we should not easily give up.
/// Jürgen
On 03/17/2016 03:20 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
On 17 March 2016 at 22:16, Juergen Sauermann
<juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de <mailto:juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de>>
wrote:
I believe all this gives us a lot of freedom to extend GNU APL
/within the boundaries of the APL syntax/ so that I
can't see why we would need to change that syntax of APL if all we
want to do is extend its functionality.
What are your thoughts of allowing the use of characters outside of
Quad-AV?
Regards,
Elias
