Hi, after reading both the ISO standard and the Dyalog definition of ⍤ several times, it seems to me as if they all describe the same thing (in different ways). Except maybe for the Dyalog ¯1 case (primarily because I don't know what "major cells" are). And the ISO standard (and therefore also GNU APL) do support negative rank parameters already (and, as far as I can see, in the same way as Dyalog). /// Jürgen On 04/27/2016 09:28 AM, Elias Mårtenson
wrote:
|
- [Bug-apl] Supporting negative ranks for ⍤ operator Elias Mårtenson
- Re: [Bug-apl] Supporting negative ranks for ⍤ op... Jay Foad
- Re: [Bug-apl] Supporting negative ranks for ... Elias Mårtenson
- Re: [Bug-apl] Supporting negative ranks for ... Jay Foad
- Re: [Bug-apl] Supporting negative ranks ... Louis de Forcrand
- Re: [Bug-apl] Supporting negative ra... Louis de Forcrand
- Re: [Bug-apl] Supporting negati... Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] Supporting ne... Alexey Veretennikov
- Re: [Bug-apl] Supporting negative ranks for ⍤ op... Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] Supporting negative ranks for ... Jay Foad
- Re: [Bug-apl] Supporting negative ranks ... Elias Mårtenson
- Re: [Bug-apl] Supporting negative ra... Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] Supporting negative ra... Alexey Veretennikov
- Re: [Bug-apl] Supporting negati... Louis de Forcrand