The first one looks more appealing because it is close to the normal function declaration syntax. Sincerely,
Grant Rettke On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Juergen Sauermann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Thinking about lambdas once more I had an idea of a syntax for declaring > local variables in > the lambda. In order to bring lambdas and proper functions closer together > rather than separating > them more than necessary, we could use the same syntax as in proper defined > functions: a list > of variable names separated by semicolons. A lambda with body ⍺+⍵ and local > variables C, D, > and E would then be declared as: > > {⍺+⍵;C;D;E} > > One could also think of > > {C;D;E;⍺+⍵} > > But the first looks more appealing to me. Any opinions? > > /// Jürgen
