Wasn't the problem that he was using an outdated compiler which gave bogus warnings when there actually was no problem?
Regards, Elias On 11 March 2017 at 23:05, <enz...@gmx.com> wrote: > you do not want to do this - it just makes code with less confidence in it > the initialization warnings should be taken care of in the code - so the > are no run time problems > doing it in compiler makes sure you are doing the right types later in run > time > > > On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:16:32 +0100 > Juergen Sauermann <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote: > > > Hi Alexey, > > > > thanks. As of SVN 899 you can now say, for example, > > > > ./configure CXX_WERROR=no > > > > Your patch was also patching generated files created by > autoconf/configure which, > > I believe, only works if the same configuration is being patched.. > > > > /// Jürgen > > > > > > > > On 03/10/2017 08:09 AM, Alexey Veretennikov wrote: > > Hi Juergen, > > > > Here is the patch which introduces the new configure option: > > --disable-werror > > If this option is set then the -Werror flag is not added to compiler > > options. > > By default it is like it is now - -Werror is present. > > > > With this option I was able to turn off compiler warnings. > > > > I ran autoreconf on my machine but it produces more diffs, which I don't > > want to attach. I believe it is better to you to run it on your machine > > and submit to svn instead of me providing them as a patch. > > > > > > > > > >
