Re: Problem with ⎕FX

[Dr . Jürgen Sauermann]

Hi Blake, thanks, fixed in SVN 1260. There was an error in the comparison of function names which made ⎕FX think that the function was pendant. A return value of 1 from ⎕FX (as below) indicates an error. Best Regards, Jürgen On 4/12/20 5:09 PM, Blake McBride wrote: Greetings, I'm not sure what ⎕FX is doing, but it's certainly wrong.       ∇abc [1] 111 [2] 222 [3] 333 [4] 444 [5] 555 [6] ∇       x←⎕CR 'abc'       x abc 111 222 333 444 555       x[4;1]←' '       x abc 111 222  33 444 555       ⎕fx x 1       ∇abc[⎕]∇     ∇ [0]   abc [1]   111 [2]   222 [3]   333 [4]   444 [5]   555     ∇ Why is 333 not 33? Thanks. Blake