* Reiner Steib (2006-10-07) writes: > On Fri, Oct 06 2006, Ralf Angeli wrote: > >> I'd propose to change this to >> (re-search-forward "[^\r\n%\\]\\([ \t]\\|\\\\\\\\\\)*%" nil t) >> unless someone can come up with a false positive or negative for this >> regexp when detecting code comments. > > Thanks, works for me. I didn't test it intensively, though.
I checked it in. And I carried out some tests before. The change is potentially dangerous nevertheless. So please keep an eye on filling. > Probably > we should have some LaTeX documents for automatic regression test, > especially for filling. We'd need the documents or snippets in their original form as well the desired result for comparison and instructions about what to do in the tests as well as some code for executing them. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
