Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> * David Kastrup (2007-03-12) writes:
>
>> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I've been wanting to implement this for some time but always got
>>> distracted.  For the time being you could use the CVS version which
>>> handles unfinished constructs much more gracefully.
>>
>> Well, I found that it helps a lot already when the local variables set
>> mode: doctex instead of mode: texdoc (no idea what my colleague
>> intended to do there).  So this particular problem seems to be gone
>> mostly for me.  Still, not accepting nil for such an option seems like
>> an omission to me.
>
> It's available now.

Thanks.  For some documents, this could be a life saver.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum


_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex

Reply via email to