* Peter Olmsted (2007-09-23) writes:
>>>>> TeX-command-list '(("TeX" "tex '\\nonstopmode\\input %t'" TeX-run-
>>>>> TeX nil t)
>>>>> ("TeX Interactive" "tex %t" TeX-run-interactive nil t)
>>>>> ("LaTeX" "latex '\\nonstopmode\\input{%t}'"
>>>>> TeX-run-LaTeX nil t)
> OK, so it looks like the Auctex I downloaded via fink (from a mirror
> somewhere) has the bug in it. To clarify: the version I downloaded
> defines latex and tex in tex-command-list with the expansion string
> "%x", but this expansion string isn't defined in tex-expand-list.
>
> I did not add this myself. Removing reference to %x from the definitions
> of tex and latex in tex-command-list now seem to work.
Well, then you can compile your documents again but it does not remedy
the problem that Fink provided you with a crippled version of AUCTeX.
The simplifications in `TeX-command-list' (compared to vanilla AUCTeX)
Fink seems to have introduced defeats functionality like source specials
or PDF mode. I cannot verify this since I don't know how to get the
source of the AUCTeX package distributed by Fink, but you could file a
bug report.
--
Ralf
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
