Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Ralf Angeli (2007-10-05) writes: > >> * Bjørn Haagensen (2007-10-05) writes: >> >>> If a function 'file' is defined running 'TeX-command-master' fails >>> with the following backtrace: >> >> An easy way out would be to rename the symbol to something less generic, >> e.g. `TeX-master-or-region-file'. A nicer way would be to get rid of >> the whole awkward construct of a locally defined function. > > The attached patch should do that. It still has the shortcoming of > `TeX-master-or-region-file' relying on `file' being defined outside of > it and indicating the function to call. Any better suggestions?
I think this tries to hard to keep the old contorted logic while still breaking backwards-compatibility with previous TeX-command-list specifications. I think we should just special-case a check for 'file and be done (for as long as TeX-command-list keeps its basic structure). Future AUCTeX programmers will thank us for it. The present logic is too clever just for the single purpose of interpreting "file". -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
