* Uwe Siart (2008-02-03) writes: > Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Yes, but the font locking mechanisms do not mimic the behavior of >> LaTeX or TeX and we therefore have to be live with some compromises if >> we don't want to make the matching overly complicated or slow. > > Then I'd vote for keeping the current state. Perhaps it handles more > cases correctly than it did before the April changes.
Probably. But the effects of failure are more devastating than before April as you could observe. Of course, if somebody has a single dollar sign in an unmatched verbatim environment there is not much difference. Perhaps we should rewrite TeX in Emacs Lisp and use that for font locking. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
