From: Ralf Angeli <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2009-04-05; Switching to web2c 7.5.6 buffer instead of source buffer Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:34:09 +0200
> Please keep the mailing list copied! Sorry ! > > * Pierre Lorenzon (2009-07-05) writes: > >> From: Ralf Angeli <[email protected]> >> >>> Probably. But since you failed to include an example for reproducing >>> the problem I cannot say for certain. >> >> Here is the beginning of the output. Anyway those buffers are so big >> that I did not want to include it in the mail : >> >> --- >> >> Running `LaTeX' on `Cahier' with ``latex -interaction=nonstopmode "\input" >> Cahier.tex'' >> This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6) > [...] >> Package amsmath Warning: Foreign command \over; >> (amsmath) \frac or \genfrac should be used instead >> (amsmath) on input line 341. > [...] >> LaTeX Warning: Command \` invalid in math mode on input line 390. >> >> >> Overfull \hbox (655.6115pt too wide) detected at line 400 >> \OML/cmm/m/it/12 x[]:x[] \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 = \OML/cmm/m/it/12 >> x[]\OT1/cmr/m/n/12 (\OML/cmm/m/it/12 x[]x[] \OMS/cmsy/m/n/12 ^^@ >> \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 2\OML/cmm/m/it/ >> 12 x[]\OT1/cmr/m/n/12 ) = (\OML/cmm/m/it/12 x[] \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 + >> \OML/cmm/m/it/12 ix[]\OT1/cmr/m/n/12 )\OML/cmm/m/it/12 x[] \OMS/cmsy/m/n/12 >> ^^@ \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 2\OML/cmm/m/it/12 x[]:x[] \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 = >> \OML/cmm/m/it/12 x[]x[] \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 + (\OML/cmm/m/it/12 i >> \OMS/cmsy/m/n/12 ^^@ \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 2)[\OML/cmm/m/it/12 x[] \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 >> + 2; +2\OML/cmm/m/it/12 ix[] \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 + 1; +(\OML/cmm/m/it/12 i[] >> \OMS/cmsy/m/n/12 ^^@ \OML/cmm/m/it/12 i\OT1/cmr/m/n/12 )\OML/cmm/m/it/12 >> x[]\OT1/cmr/m/n/12 ] = \OML/cmm/m/it/12 x[] \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 + 3 + >> 2(\OML/cmm/m/it/12 i \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 + 1)\OML/cmm/m/it/12 x[] >> \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 + 2; +(\OML/cmm/m/it/12 i[] \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 + >> 2\OML/cmm/m/it/12 i \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 + 1 \OMS/cmsy/m/n/12 ^^@ >> \OML/cmm/m/it/12 i \OMS/cmsy/m/n/12 ^^@ \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 1)\OML/cmm/m/it/12 >> x[] \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 + 1; +(\OML/cmm/m/it/12 i \OMS/cmsy/m/n/12 ^^@ >> \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 2)[\OML/cmm/m/it/12 x[] \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 + 2; >> +2\OML/cmm/m/it/12 ix[] \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 + 1; +(\OML/cmm/m/it/12 i[] >> \OMS/cmsy/m/n/12 ^^@ \OML/cmm/m/it/12 i\OT1/cmr/m/n/12 )\OML/cmm/m/it/12 >> x[]\OT1/cmr/m/n/12 ] = \OML/cmm/m/it/12 x[] \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 + 3; >> +3\OML/cmm/m/it/12 ix[] \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 + 2; 3(\OML/cmm/m/it/12 i[] >> \OMS/cmsy/m/n/12 ^^@ \OML/cmm/m/it/12 i\OT1/cmr/m/n/12 )\OML/cmm/m/it/12 x[] >> \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 + 1; +\OML/cmm/m/it/12 i\OT1/cmr/m/n/12 (\OML/cmm/m/it/12 i >> \OMS/cmsy/m/n/12 ^^@ \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 1)(\OML/cmm/m/it/12 i \OMS/cmsy/m/n/12 >> ^^@ \OT1/cmr/m/n/12 2) > [...] >> [] \U/msb/m/n/12 Z\OT1/cmr/m/n/12 [[]] \OML/cmm/m/it/12 : >> [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46]) [47] [48] >> ! Missing \endgroup inserted. >> <inserted text> >> \endgroup >> l.158 \begin{eqnarray*} >> >> ! Extra alignment tab has been changed to \cr. >> <template> \egroup \endtemplate >> >> l.160 &\mbox{d'où}& >> \\ >> ! Extra alignment tab has been changed to \cr. >> <template> \egroup \endtemplate >> >> --- >> >> I think, lines after this are not significant. Here is the >> first error. Parser should go backward and find first pair of >> not closed parenthesis, shouldn't it ? I suspect it is the >> normal behavior of this engine. > > The parser is working with a stack where a new entry is pushed on the > stack when an opening paren is encountered and the topmost entry is > popped again when a closing paren is found. When an error is found, the > topmost entry on the stack will be used to find the file related to the > error. Clear for me !! > > Anyway, don't you think you should get rid of all these overfull hbox > warnings? Perhaps then the problem with the parser will go away. Sure I can try that ! Anyway, that's not the way I usually debug my TeX code but if it can help to find out where the problem comes from I'll try ! > > Also, you can enable file:line:error messages in your TeX > engine. This Hum ! I do not fully understand this point. Is it an option to pass to the TeX/LaTeX executable ? Pierre
_______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
