Hi Piet, 2014-10-19 19:33 GMT+02:00 Piet van Oostrum <[email protected]>: > Ralf Angeli wrote: > > > * Mosè Giordano (2014-10-19) writes: > > > > > Thank you. I've just noticed also insertion of other environments, > > > like itemize, gives weird results when > > > `comment-auto-fill-only-comments' is non-nil. Does it make sense to > > > let-bind this variable to nil when calling `indent-new-comment-line' > > > in the line referenced by Piet? > > > > Actually I'm a bit surprised that the behavior of > > `comment-indent-new-line' is changed in such a way by the value of > > `comment-auto-fill-only-comments'. Especially since the doc string of > > `comment-indent-new-line' does not mention anything about it. > > > > Anyway, setting `comment-auto-fill-only-comments' to nil would work but > > might be a bit strange because it does not seem to be directly related > > to the behavior of `comment-indent-new-line'. An alternative could be to > > call `comment-indent-new-line' only when point is actually in a > > comment. But this will mean more code on our side. > > > > I don't have a clear preference for any solution. Perhaps let-binding > > the variable might currently be the saver alternative. > > > > -- > > Ralf > > (This is a copy of an earlier message by me that you – Ralf – did not receive > directly) > > I think I have found another solution. LaTeX-newline should check if it is > inside a comment and then call indent-new-comment-line, and if not, call > newline. > > I propose to replace the > (t > (indent-new-comment-line))) > with > ((TeX-in-comment) > (indent-new-comment-line)) > (t > (newline)))
Ok, I'll apply this change tomorrow, I can't do that right now. Thank you, bye, Mosè _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
