2014-11-25 15:42 GMT+01:00 Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es>:
> Grrr, this breaks backwards[1] compatibility

This time I'd call it backward ;-)

> Couldn't that have been optional?

Well, perhaps yes and I'll think about making it optional, but you
took part into the discussion about this change and didn't object :-)

Bye,
Mosè



_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex

Reply via email to