Uwe Brauer writes:
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (invalid-regexp "Invalid regular expression")
>
> re-search-forward("\\(?:\\\\label{\\(?1:[^}]*\\)}\\|\\[[^]]*\\<label[[:space:]]*=[[:space:]]*{?\\(?1:[^],}]+\\)}?\\)\\|\\(^\\)[
>
> ]*\\\\\\(begin{SaveListing}\\|part\\|chapter\\|section\\|subsection\\|subsubsection\\|paragraph\\|subparagraph\\|addchap\\|addsec\\)\\*?\\(\\[[^]]*\\]\\)?[[{
>
\n\\]\\|\\(^\\)[ ]*\\\\\\(include\\|input\\|subfile\\)[{
]+\\([^} \n
]+\\)\\|\\(^\\)[
]*\\(\\\\appendix\\)\\|\\(\\\\glossary\\|\\\\index\\|\\\\nomenclature\\)[[{]"
nil t)
It's the "\\(?1:" construct, which I have no idea what it is.
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-number-of-arguments
> define-obsolete-variable-alias 3)
> define-obsolete-variable-alias(reftex-toc-map reftex-toc-mode-map "24.1")
*sigh* Gotta love the way the GNUbies whose whole point is software
freedom assume there's only one implementation of any given language.
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
