So, this will be released to elpa eventually?
Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Tassilo, > > 2016-03-27 22:02 GMT+02:00 Tassilo Horn <[email protected]>: >> Waleed Yousef <[email protected]> writes: >> >> Hi Waleed, >> >>> the good news is that the problem disappeared. However, a new problem >>> occurred. >>> >>> For some preamble (which is really weird) the pdf does not revert >>> (refresh); however it goes to the right page (but without >>> refreshing). For the following preamble, when I comment some packages >>> the problem disappear!! >> >> Good catch! We've called `TeX-after-compilation-finished-functions' >> only if `TeX-error-list' was empty with the intention that you don't >> want to revert when errors have occurred which usually means that the >> PDF will be broken anyhow. However, your preamble issues lots of >> warnings, and those are collected in `TeX-error-list', too. >> >> I've fixed it in Git so that the hook is skipped only if there were real >> errors and not just warnings. Here is the patch: >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> modified tex-buf.el >> @@ -1551,7 +1551,7 @@ Rerun to get mark in right position\\." nil t) >> (md5 (current-buffer))))) >> (push (cons idx-file t) LaTeX-idx-changed-alist))) >> >> - (unless TeX-error-list >> + (unless (memq 'error (mapcar #'car TeX-error-list)) >> (run-hook-with-args 'TeX-after-compilation-finished-functions >> (with-current-buffer TeX-command-buffer >> (expand-file-name >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > I changed it to use `TeX-error-report-switches' as it is simpler than > going through `TeX-error-list' and it's the usual way to test presence > of errors in the last TeX run. Maybe we should turn the whole > `plist-get' call into a function. > > Bye, > Mosè _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
