Here are my two cents as a somewhat average emacs user (then I'll butt out and let you all decide what you want to do).
I have around 30 packages that I install through ELPA. Since this is pretty unwieldy, I have these all configured using the "use-package" macro, which will automatically download missing packages and `require' them as necessary. This makes installations on new machines really simple. However, since AUCTeX doesn't have any (require 'auctex) line, use-package will fail and AUCTeX won't install. That means that out of the 30 packages I have, I am required to install AUCTeX manually. Now that I know that AUCTeX will work when you just install it, it is indeed not too hard to get AUCTeX working. However, my main hangup in this whole issue is that I expected AUCTeX to work like all the other packages I use. So it's not that AUCTeX is hard to install per se, it's just that it's different than all the other 30 packages that I use. This, in my experience, has always made AUCTeX confusing to me in the past. Whatever you decided to do, thanks for all your work on this. Caleb On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > 2016-07-27 5:14 GMT+02:00 Stefan Monnier <[email protected]>: > > The intent is not to make the installation easier. > > It's to make it compatible with the old (require 'tex-site) method. > > But as mentioned, maybe rather than make (require 'tex-site) work, it > > might be preferable to emit a warning explaining that it's better to > > just do nothing and let package-initialize do its job. > > Ok, I see. Then I'd personally prefer to go by this route (do not use > `require' at all), but Tassilo is the main maintainer of AUCTeX on > ELPA. Tassilo, what's your opinion on this? > > Bye, > Mosè >
_______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
