Ken Sharp <ken.sh...@artifex.com> writes: > The problem is that PostScript is a programming language, and the > snippets above, intermingled with some other language, are a) > difficult to read and b) shorn of context. Its hard for me to pick out > just the PostScript from whatever the other language is and without > knowing what the aim is its pretty much impossible to figure out what > the PostScript is doing.
Hi Ken, thanks for your response. I was afraid that the solution would not be that easy by just replacing some PostScript-code in an Elisp-function :-) > I don't suppose there's anyone still around who knows what the > PostScript is supposed to do ? I really need to discuss this with > someone who understands the intended purpose of that PostScript code. David K. is the principle author of preview-latex and he is still around. I hope he can manage to find a solution with you, somehow. > If you want to go down that route, then can I suggest reopening our > bug 698680: > > https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698680 > > and attaching the PostScript file there (and any other files needed to > make the program run). Thanks for the offer. I'm looking forward to seeing if David and you can find a solution. If it comes to file exchange, we can go this route. Best, Arash _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
