Hi all,
please consider the following example:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{listings}
\begin{document}
\begin{lstlisting}[
caption={Some caption},
label=lst:1]
Some code
\end{lstlisting}
\begin{lstlisting}[
caption={Some caption},
label=lst:2
]
Some code
\end{lstlisting}
\begin{lstlisting}[
caption = {Some caption},
label = lst:3 ]
Some code
\end{lstlisting}
\ref{lst:1}, \ref{lst:2
}, \ref{lst:3 }
\ref{lst:1}, \ref{lst:2}, \ref{lst:3}
\end{document}
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
With RefTeX active, it fails to parse the labels defined in optional
arguments correctly (see the first set of \ref commands). It is due to
the regex defined in `reftex-label-regexps' in `reftex-vars.el' which
expects one of ],} directly after the label. With the following patch,
it parses the labels correctly:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
diff --git a/lisp/textmodes/reftex-vars.el b/lisp/textmodes/reftex-vars.el
index 11dbb8d..66d800d 100644
--- a/lisp/textmodes/reftex-vars.el
+++ b/lisp/textmodes/reftex-vars.el
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ DOWNCASE t: Downcase words before using them."
"\\\\label{\\(?1:[^}]*\\)}"
;; keyvals [..., label = {foo}, ...] forms used by ctable,
;; listings, minted, ...
-
"\\[[^][]\\{0,2000\\}\\<label[[:space:]]*=[[:space:]]*{?\\(?1:[^],}]+\\)}?")
+ "\\[[^][]\\{0,2000\\}\\<label[[:space:]]*=[[:space:]]*{?\\(?1:[^],
\t\n\r%}]+\\)}?")
"List of regexps matching \\label definitions.
The default value matches usual \\label{...} definitions and
keyval style [..., label = {...}, ...] label definitions. It is
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Any suggestion if I'm missing a character? My next step would be to add
the same regexp to `LaTeX-auto-label-regexp-list' in order to make
AUCTeX also capable of this feature. Any comments welcome.
Best, Arash
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
