Hi David,

>>>>> David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes:
> The usual "oh, we decided change is good and clobbered over the previous
> API."  Presumably one of the listed hooks can be used instead, possibly
> mimicking what the mentioned patch does to lib/pdf2dsc.ps .

Are you thinking that it isn't fruitful to follow up the development of
ghostscript every time incompatible change is introduced?

Regards,
Ikumi Keita



_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex

Reply via email to