Gustavo Barros <gusbrs.2...@gmail.com> writes: Hi Gustavo,
> As of the latest AUCTeX release, when `LaTeX-syntactic-comments' is t, > as it is by default, calling `indent-for-tab-command' ("TAB") before > the start of the comment text on the line will move point to the start > of the comment text. I believe this to be unexpected, but I might be > missing something from expected behavior. Either way, I can provide > at least one example of inconvenience resulting from this when it > interacts with `electric-indent-mode' (also on by default). I was able to reproduce the behavior by your very good recipe. Basically, I like the behavior to move point to the actual comment text but the combination with `electric-indent-mode' is indeed very annyoing. I've changed it on our git master so that it'll jump after the % only if the currently executing interactive command is an indentation command (and not, e.g., `TeX-newline'). Here's the changed definition. Please eval it and see if you spot some raw edges. --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (defun LaTeX-back-to-indentation (&optional force-type) "Move point to the first non-whitespace character on this line. If it is commented and comments are formatted syntax-aware move point to the first non-whitespace character after the comment character(s), but only if `this-command' is an actual indentation command. The optional argument FORCE-TYPE can be used to force point being moved to the inner or outer indentation in case of a commented line. The symbols 'inner and 'outer are recognized." (if (or (and force-type (eq force-type 'inner)) (and (not force-type) (or (and (TeX-in-line-comment) (eq major-mode 'doctex-mode)) (and (TeX-in-commented-line) ;; Only move after the % if we're actually ;; performing an indent command and something ;; else like our `TeX-newline-function' which ;; will be invoked automatically by ;; `electric-indent-mode' (bug#47757). (memq this-command `(,indent-line-function indent-for-tab-command LaTeX-indent-line)) LaTeX-syntactic-comments)))) (progn (beginning-of-line) ;; Should this be anchored at the start of the line? (TeX-re-search-forward-unescaped (concat "\\(?:" TeX-comment-start-regexp "+[ \t]*\\)+") (line-end-position) t)) (back-to-indentation))) ;; <-- C-x C-e here! --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex