Cyril Arnould <cyril.arno...@outlook.com> writes: >>Did you run ./autogen.sh before ./configure? > > I did, yes, I attached the output in case you're interested. It seems > like it starts failing after the following line: > > checking for install-info... /usr/bin/install-info > > The problem is I end up with an empty Makefile, so make fails > afterwards.
Hmm, can't tell what's going wrong. I'm also using Msys2/Mingw64 on Win10 and don't see this issue. I do: $ ./autogen.sh $ ./configure --without-texmf-dir --with-lispdir=. $ make > I think what was missing were the following lines from the > AUCTeX-documentation: > > (load "auctex.el" nil t t) > (load "preview-latex.el" nil t t) > > When I added those, it worked. When you install AUCTeX from anywhere else than ELPA, you need those line, true. > I guess these lines are not necessary when installing via ELPA? True. There were reports where the 2 lines above were even harmful when installed from ELPA. > I think I've changed this based off of this post: > > https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/41321/when-to-specify-a-package-name-in-use-packages-ensure-tag/41324#41324 > > I wanted to load LaTeX-mode, not TeX-mode, which is in latex.el. The reason I was asking it that active contributors don't use use-package and we currently have this in the manual: (use-package tex :ensure auctex) If that's not right, we should change it (but it seems there is no definitive answer to this ;-) > Anyway, the patch was still working with the properly installed > auctex. Indeed, Keita has installed it, so the issue is now resolved and should be available via ELPA also sometimes soon. Best, Arash _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex