Arash Esbati <[email protected]> writes: > thanks for pushing me into that again. I did already but I missed > what's happening in that function directly in the first form: > > (fill-move-to-break-point linebeg) > > It moves the point to different positions. In the example above, put > point after \path{bar} and do: > > M-: (fill-move-to-break-point (line-beginning-position)) RET > > and the point before and. Now go after \verb|bar| and do the same, no > is point after and. Can you reproduce this?
Yes, I can. BTW, only the last sentence is broken correctly, all others are wrapped around at a too early position. Hm, (fill-nobreak-p) returns nil only on the \ of the \verb|bar| but returns non-nil on each \ of the other verbatim macros. (I can't look any further now so it's your turn again. ;-)) Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
