Ikumi Keita <[email protected]> writes: >> Indeed, that would be nice. However, only the committed auctex.el in >> the ELPA version has a Version header. Whenever that changes, a new >> ELPA release is triggered. So the rule would need to regenerate >> auctex.el from auctex.el.in but inject the very same Version as the >> old one had. > > Hmm, then the rule is to generate auctex.el.out instead of auctex.el and > admin/release-process.org should be changed to direct to rename > auctex.el.out to auctex.el before editing auctex.el?
Or admin/release-process.org should just mention that auctex.el.in should be checked if Package-Requires or something else has been changed which would need to be copied over to auctex.el manually. >> I've done it now and merged from master. Are you fine with pushing >> another ELPA release now? > > Yes, please. Will do! Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
