Hi Gustavo,
Gustavo Barros <gusbrs.2...@gmail.com> writes:
> thank you very much for the patches. They are really appreciated.
> And sorry for the delay in reporting back. I didn't have the time
> these last couple of days to look at this with due care.
Sorry for my late response; it seems I didn't have time during the last
couple of years ;-) Somehow this report went lost.
> I've performed some tests with the patches you sent on the full set of
> biblatex's citation commands, and can gladly report that both "C-c &"
> (reftex-view-crossref) and "C-c [" (reftex-citation) (when issued on
> the key of an existing citation command) work flawlessly on all of
> them.
I had a look again and I plan to install the following change in Emacs
master:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
diff --git a/lisp/textmodes/reftex-parse.el b/lisp/textmodes/reftex-parse.el
index 9694a1364d3..6e1c229561a 100644
--- a/lisp/textmodes/reftex-parse.el
+++ b/lisp/textmodes/reftex-parse.el
@@ -801,17 +801,17 @@ reftex-notice-new
)
(defsubst reftex-move-to-previous-arg (&optional bound)
- "Assuming that we are in front of a macro argument,
-move backward to the closing parenthesis of the previous argument.
-This function understands the splitting of macros over several lines
-in TeX."
+ "Move backward to the closing parenthesis of the previous argument.
+This happens under the assumption that we are in front of a macro
+argument. This function understands the splitting of macros over
+several lines in TeX."
(cond
;; Just to be quick:
- ((memq (preceding-char) '(?\] ?\})))
+ ((memq (preceding-char) '(?\] ?\) ?\})))
;; Do a search
((and reftex-allow-detached-macro-args
(re-search-backward
- "[]}][ \t]*[\n\r]?\\([ \t]*%[^\n\r]*[\n\r]\\)*[ \t]*\\=" bound t))
+ "[])}][ \t]*[\n\r]?\\([ \t]*%[^\n\r]*[\n\r]\\)*[ \t]*\\=" bound t))
(goto-char (1+ (match-beginning 0)))
t)
(t nil)))
@@ -860,13 +860,19 @@ reftex-what-macro
(while (and (reftex-move-to-previous-arg bound)
(condition-case nil
(let ((forward-sexp-function nil))
- (backward-sexp) t)
+ (if (eq (preceding-char) ?\))
+ (let ((temp-table (make-syntax-table)))
+ (modify-syntax-entry ?\( "()" temp-table)
+ (modify-syntax-entry ?\) ")(" temp-table)
+ (with-syntax-table temp-table
+ (backward-sexp)))
+ (backward-sexp))
+ t)
(error nil)))
- (if (eq (following-char) ?\[) (cl-incf cnt-opt))
+ (if (memq (following-char) '(?\( ?\[)) (cl-incf cnt-opt))
(cl-incf cnt))
(setq pos (point))
- (when (and (or (= (following-char) ?\[)
- (= (following-char) ?\{))
+ (when (and (memq (following-char) '(?\[ ?\( ?\{))
(re-search-backward "\\\\[*a-zA-Z]+\\=" nil t))
(setq cmd (reftex-match-string 0))
(when (looking-at "\\\\begin{[^}]*}")
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Do you have the chance to install this locally and test it again? I
will push it afterwards. Thanks.
> But, in performing the tests, I observed some other things associated
> with biblatex's citation commands (some related to this issue, some
> not) that I might as well report too, in the hope they will be
> useful. As a regular biblatex user, I consider them minor.
>
> 1 - The multicite variants of 'volcite' are neither fontified nor call
> RefTeX when inserted (with "C-c RET"). They are inserted "plain" but,
> once inserted, "C-c [" will work on them. They are the following:
> -volcites
> -Volcites
> -pvolcites
> -Pvolcites
> -fvolcites
> -Fvolcites
> -svolcites
> -Svolcites
> -tvolcites
> -Tvolcites
> -avolcites
> -Avolcites
Fontification should work now for limited number of args:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/auctex.git/tree/font-latex.el#n305
> 2 - A couple of 'volcite' variants are fontified, but don't call
> RefTeX when inserted:
> -pvolcite
> -ftvolcite
Fixed with commit 9ba0093b.
> 3 - One command is not fontified:
> -footfullcite
Is fixed.
> 4 - 'mcite'-like citation commands are neither fontified, nor call
> RefTeX when inserted:
> -mcite
> -Mcite
> -mparencite
> -Mparencite
> -mfootcite
> -mfootcitetext
> -mtextcite
> -Mtextcite
This is indeed nasty because of the notation (biblatex.pdf, page 120):
\mcite{key1,setA,*keyA1,*keyA2,*keyA3,key2,setB,*keyB1,*keyB2,*keyB3}
I have no idea what the best approach for this is.
Again, sorry the late response.
Best, Arash
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
