Hi Ikumi, On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 15:31 (+0900), Ikumi Keita wrote:
> Thank you for your report. None of the AUCTeX maintainer uses ConTeXt, so > inputs from ConTeXt user are valuable. Glad you think so! >>>>>> Jim <[email protected]> writes: >> (1) TeX-command-list contains the following >> ("ConTeXt" "%(cntxcom) --once --texutil %(extraopts) %(execopts)%t" >> and --texutil isn't in texlive 2023's context, texlive 2024's context, >> or the context in the ConTeXt distribution. > It is easy to remove "--texutil", but I'd like to ask whether it is safe > for older (before 2023) TeX distribution to do so. What was this option > "--texutil" for? Unfortunately, "context --help" of TeX Live 2024 > doesn't give me useful information. I am a relatively recent ConTeXt convert, so I have never used it. However, the documentation I can find indicates that texutil was used for ConTeXt Mk II, which has (long since) been deprecated (as I understand it). I guess since it doesn't hurt anything, it could stay, but I think that it has no use in ConTeXt Mk IV. >> (2) A recent change (early April 2024?) to context has changed how >> synctex is done. >> On the good side, with the right option context will produce a >> synctex file that epdfinfo knows how to parse. >> On the bad side, >> (a) rather than calling with "--synctex=1" (as done in >> ConTeXt-expand-options in context.el) the correct option is now >> "--synctex=repeat"; >> (b) but if context is called with "--nonstopmode" (or "--nonstop") >> the "--synctex=..." request to create a synctex file is over-ridden. >> It is easy for a user who knows what is going on to use >> (setq ConTeXt-texexec-option-nonstop "") >> but changing --synctex=1 to --synctex=repeat seems to require >> a redefinition of the function. >> The --synctex=repeat version may not have reached texlive 2024 yet, but >> using --synctex=repeat with the version of context in TL2024 creates the >> same synctex file as --synctex=1, so there seems to be no harm in >> changing this. > OK, then I'll change "--synctex=1" to "--synctex=repeat", expecting that > the situation about compatibility is the same for older ConTeXt. Thanks. >> Bonus "bug": TeX-submit-bug-report suggests upgrading to the version from >> https://www.gnu.org/software/auctex, but as of today that would be a >> downgrade, since it says the current auctex version is 13.3. > The message is followed by "if your installation is older than the one > available from the web site.", isn't it? 🙂 Good point! Cheers. Jim _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
